Problem of evil research paper
However, if all that God created was good, from where does un-good come. But it is surely conceivable that we should have acquired these concepts wholly through encounters with vivid moral fictions -- fairy tells in which the bad guys perform evil acts.
The drunk driver survives. However, this need for riches will cause a man to have conflicts and altercations in his life One answer that might be offered would be that some form of consequentialism is true—such as, for example, the view that an action that fails to maximize the balance of good states of affairs over bad states of affairs is morally wrong.
The problem of evil holds to be a good argument. Thus some would argue, for example, that the frustration that one experiences in trying to solve a difficult problem is outweighed by the satisfaction of arriving at a solution, and therefore that the world is a better place because it contains such evils.
For the reason given, it is not a cogent criticism.
Problem of evil conclusion
No, God knows well that the moment you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like gods who know what is good and what is bad. Justify your answer and respond to possible objections. Therefore: God does not exist. Therefore, from 1 , 2 , and 3 : There is no omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect person. Compare the situation with a very long conjunction: given any particular conjunct, it may be likely that that conjunct is true, while being very unlikely that every conjunct, and hence the conjunction as a whole, is true. Those who have experience some form of tragedy often wonder why evil is in this world if there is also and all-loving, all-knowing, and all-powerful This leaves the theist with two plausible lines of response: He can deny premise 2 and maintain that divine benevolence is compatible with the existence of unnecessary natural evil, or he can deny the existence of such evil altogether. Describe the extent to which- if any- you personally have been troubled by the problem of evil. The first, which might be called the direct inductive approach, involves the idea that one can show that theism is unlikely to be true without comparing theism with any alternative hypothesis, other than the mere denial of theism. From the time I was old enough to understand the mystery, I constantly questioned why God would allow people to suffer. The argument at hand is that if a perfect God exists, there would be no evil in the world and since evil exists, there is no God It seems possible, then, that there might be evils that are logically necessary for goods that outweigh them, and this possibility provides a reason, accordingly, for questioning one of the premises in the argument set out earlier—namely, premise 4 , where it is claimed that if God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil. Or that the universe is better with some evil in it.
based on 99 review